Sunday, August 8, 2010

Archaeometry-related conferences-2011 همايش هاي با موضوعات مرتبط با باستان سنجي در سال 90-1389

در ادامه همايش هاي با موضوعات مرتبط با باستان سنجي در سال هاي 90-1389 و لينك هاي مربوطه ارائه مي گردند:ا


Archaeometry-related conferences-2011


3rd International Conference Archaeometallurgy in Europe 2011
29 June - 1 July 2011
Deutsches Bergbau-Museum Bochum - Germany

http://aie3.bergbaumuseum.de/tiki-index.php?page=1st%20Announcement

--- --- --- ---

XVIIth International Congress od Ancient Bronzes
May 21-25, 2011 / Izmir TURKEY
The Art of Bronzes in Anatolia and the Eastern Mediterranean from Protogeometric to Early Byzantine Periods (10th century B.C. to 7th century A.D.)
Contact Addresses:
XVIIth International Bronze Congress
c/o Doc. Dr. Ergun LAFLI
Dokuz Eylul Universitesi
Edebiyat Fakultesi
Arkeoloji Bolumu
Tinaztepe/Kaynaklar Yerleskesi
Buca
TR-35160 Izmir TURKEY
Fax: +90.232.453 41 88
E-mail:


With thanks to Mr. Juan van der Roest for providing the links
با تشكر از آقاي يوآن فان در روست براي در اختيار گذاشتن لينك هاي مربوطه

Extracts of Cyrus The Great Cylinder Discovered in China كشف گزيده اي (باستاني) از منشور كورش بزرگ در چين

كشف گزيده اي (باستاني) از منشور كورش بزرگ در چين

دو قطعه استخوان سنگواره شده اسب با سنگ نوشته اي به خط ميخي كشف شده اند كه متن اين نوشته ها شامل بخشي از منشور معروف كورش بزرگ است. خو شنوي اين استخوان هاي سنگواره شده را در سال 1985 به موزه كاخ پكن اهدا كرده بود. به گفته شنوي استخوان ها به ترتيب در سال هاي 1935 و 1940 توسط وي خريداري شده بودند. مطلبي كه شنوي را به خريد استخوان ها ترغيب كرده بود خط ناشناخته كنده كاري شده بر روي آنها بود كه به نظر او يك خط ناشناخته چين باستان بود. اخيراً يكي از كارشناسان موزه بريتانيا با بررسي دوباره استخوان ها متوجه شد كه استخوان ها دربردارنده بخشي از متن منشور كورش بزرگ هستند. مطلب بيشتر در اين مورد را در ادامه به زبان انگليسي بخوانيد:ا

British Museum curator has identified cuneiform text inscribed on horse bones

Two fossilised horse bones with cuneiform inscriptions have been found in China, carved with extracts from the Cyrus the Great Cylinder. They were initially dismissed as fakes because of the improbability of ancient Persian texts turning up in Beijing. But following new research, British Museum (BM) specialist Irving Finkel is now convinced of their authenticity.

This discovery looks set to transform our knowledge about what is arguably the most important surviving cuneiform text, written in the world’s earliest script. Dating from 539BC, the Cyrus Cylinder was ceremonially buried in the walls of Babylon. Its text celebrates the achievements of Cyrus the Great, ruler of the Persian empire. The clay cylinder was excavated by BM archaeologists in 1879 and sent to London, where it is one of the museum’s most important antiquities.


The texts found in China inexplicably have fewer than one in every 20 of the Cyrus text’s cuneiform signs transcribed, although they are in the correct order. The two inscribed bones were donated to the Palace Museum in Beijing in 1985 by Xue Shenwei, an elderly Chinese traditional doctor who died later that year. He said that he had learned about the pair of inscriptions in 1928. He bought the first bone in 1935 and the second in 1940, and named the sellers. Xue acquired them because he thought they were written in an unknown ancient script, presumably from China. In 1966, during the Cultural Revolution, he buried the bones for protection, digging them up later. Chinese scholars who have pursued the story believe that Xue’s account is credible.


In 1983 Xue offered the bones to the Palace Museum in the Forbidden City, which collects inscriptions. It was then that specialists told him they were written in cuneiform. It was not until two years later, when Xue donated the objects, that specialist Wu Yuhong realised that the text of the first bone came from the Cyrus proclamation (the text of the second was not identified).


The discovery


Until this year it was generally assumed that the Cyrus Cylinder was a unique object, created for ceremonial burial, and that the text had not been disseminated. Then in January two fragments of an inscribed clay tablet in the BM’s collection were found to contain part of the proclamation, suggesting that it might have been widely copied. Finkel returned to the pair of Chinese bones, to reconsider whether they might be authentic. He realised that the text on the second bone was also from the Cyrus proclamation (which had been missed in 1985), and requested more information from Beijing.


Chinese Assyriologist Yushu Gong went to the Palace Museum store to examine the bones, and also arranged a new rubbing of the inscription (done with black wax on paper), which provides a much better image of the text than existing photographs. Yushu took these to London, for a workshop that was held at the BM on 23-24 June.












Irving Finkel with a rubbing of the ancient Chinese bones


Are the bones fakes?

The obvious question is whether the inscriptions are fakes—although they would be bizarre objects to fake. Why would a faker use fossilised horse bone, a material never used before for this purpose? If the bones had indeed been acquired by Xue by 1940, it would not have been easy for a Chinese forger to have gained access to the Cyrus text, which only became widely known later in the 20th century. Why would a faker have carved only one in 20 of the characters, which meant that it took years before the Cyrus text was identified? And why would a faker have sold the bones in China, where there has been virtually no market for non-Chinese antiquities?


The clinching factor for Finkel is that the partial text on the bones differs slightly from that on the Cyrus Cylinder, although it is correct in linguistic terms. Cuneiform changed over the centuries, and the signs on the bones are in a less evolved form than that of the cylinder. The individual wedge-like strokes of the signs are also different and have a slightly v-shaped top, a form that was not used in Babylon, but was used by scribes in Persia.


"The text used by the copier on the bones was not the Cyrus Cylinder, but another version, probably originally written in Persia, rather than Babylon," Finkel believes. It could have been a version carved on stone, written with ink on leather, or inscribed on a clay tablet. Most likely the original object was sent during the reign of Cyrus to the far east of his empire, in the west of present-day China.


Scholars at the workshop had little time to digest the new evidence, and inevitably there was some scepticism. But Finkel concludes that the evidence is "completely compelling". He is convinced that the bones have been copied from an authentic version of the Cyrus proclamation, although it is unclear at what point in the past 2,500 years the copying was done.


Source:http://www.cais-soas.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=130:extracts-of-cyrus-the-great-cylinder-discovered-in-china&catid=43


Thursday, August 5, 2010

Serbian site may have hosted first copper makers! ادعاي كشف قديمي ترين محوطه فلزكاري مس در صربستان


تيمي متشكل از پژوهشگران صرب، انگليسي و آلماني اخيراً شواهدي از استحصال مس (شامل قطعات سرباره) به قدمت حدود 7000 سال را در محوطه اي باستاني در صربستان كشف نموده اند. توضيح مطلب را در ادامه به زبان انگليسي بخوانيد!ا


Finds intensify debate over Old World origins of metal production

An archaeological site in southeastern Europe has shown its metal. This ancient settlement contains the oldest securely dated evidence of copper making, from 7,000 years ago, and suggests that copper smelting may been invented in separate parts of Asia and Europe at that time rather than spreading from a single source.

The find extends the known record of copper smelting by about 500 years, an archaeological team headed by Miljana Radivojević and Thilo Rehren of University College London reports in an upcoming Journal of Archaeological Science. The pair were joined by Serbian researchers, led by Dušan Šljivar of the National Museum Belgrade, and German scientists directed by Ernst Pernicka of the University of Tübingen.

Chemical and microscopic analyses of previously unearthed material from Serbia’s Belovode site have identified pieces of copper slag, the residue of an intense heating process used to separate copper from other ore elements. The raw material came from nearby copper-ore deposits in Serbia or Bulgaria, they add.

“Our finds provide the earliest secure dates for copper smelting and indicate the existence of different, possibly independent centers of invention of metallurgy,” Rehren says. Metallurgy is the process of extracting metals from ore in order to create useful objects.

Large numbers of copper artifacts have been found at southeastern European sites dating to more than 6,000 years ago, Rehren notes.

His proposal challenges a longstanding view that copper smelting spread to Europe after originating in or near the Fertile Crescent region of what’s now southern Iran. Archaeologists have dated copper smelting in the Middle East to about 6,500 years ago.

Although Belovode now stands as the world’s oldest known copper-smelting site, that status probably won’t last, remarks archaeologist Benjamin Roberts of the British Museum in London. “It’s likely we’ll see copper-smelting evidence at least contemporary with Belovode from the Fertile Crescent once research programs are in place at well-excavated sites,” he predicts.

Copper smelting may have originated in what’s now Turkey, comments archaeologist Christopher Thornton of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. By 10,000 years ago, people living there were making beads and other ornaments from copper ore and heating the ore at low temperatures to make it more pliable, he says. Scattered evidence of early smelting in that region has yet to be thoroughly studied.

Roberts and Thornton agree that copper making was probably invented in one spot, either in Turkey or the Middle East.

Rehren’s group is now examining possible copper slag from sites in Turkey and Iran that date to 7,000 years ago or more.

Radiocarbon dates for animal bones excavated at Belovode indicate that the site was occupied from 7,350 to 6,650 years ago. Jewelry and other Belovode finds come from southeastern Europe’s ancient Vinča culture, known for having used copper vessels and other metal items.

Chemical analyses of metallic-looking bits from Belovode identified five pieces of copper slag. Large amounts of iron, manganese, zinc and cobalt in this material likely derived from smelted copper ores, Rehren’s team says. Differences in the concentration of elements across samples indicate that each was produced in a separate smelting event. Slag pieces were laced with ash from wood that presumably had been burned to create smelting temperatures of about 1,100° Celsius.

Microscopic studies of slag pieces revealed glassy areas and crystallized metal oxides that had formed during a process of heating the material until it liquefied, followed by cooling.

A drop of once-molten metal found in a Belovode house contains pure copper, the researchers add.

Lead-isotope ratios of the Belovode slag and the copper drop link them to ore deposits in Serbia and Bulgaria.

No smelting chambers, such as elongated ceramic cylinders recovered at later Copper Age sites in southwestern Asia, have been found at Belovode. Vinca residents may have dug pits for copper smelting, the scientists speculate.

By: Bruce Bower (July 17th, 2010)

Source:http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/60563/title/Serbian_site_may_have_hosted_first_copper_makers


Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Useful links چند لينك مفيد

SOCIETIES
-The Society for Archaeological Sciences
http://www.socarchsci.org/
http://socarchsci.blogspot.com/
-AK-Archäometrie in der GDCh (Arbeitskeis Archäometrie)
http://www.ak-archaeometrie.de/archaeometrie/index.html
-Arbeitskreises für Archäometrie und Denkmalpflege der Deutschen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft
http://www.dmg-arbeitskreis.archaeometrie.uni-wuerzburg.de/
-Gesellschaft für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie ARCHAEOMETRIE
http://www.archaeometrie.de/
-Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr)
http://www.associazioneaiar.it/
-Hellenic Society for Archaeometry
http://www.archaeometry.gr/

RESEARCH GROUPS AND LABORATORIES
-The Archaeometry research group of the University of Fribourg
http://www.unifr.ch/geoscience/mineralogy/archmet/index.php
-Program on Ancient Technologies and Archaeological Materials (ATAM), Illinois State Archaeological Survey
-http://www.itarp.uiuc.edu/atam/archaeometry_archaeology/whatisarchaeometry.html

-Curt-Engelhorn Zentrum Archäometrie
http://www.cez-archaeometrie.de/de/
-Abteilung für Jüngere Urgeschichte Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen
http://www.ufg.uni-tuebingen.de/index.php?id=117
-The Archaeometry Laboratory
at the University of Missouri Research Reactor
http://archaeometry.missouri.edu/

-The Munich Archaeometry Group
http://www.physik.tu-muenchen.de/lehrstuehle/E15b/research/arch/welcome.htm
-University of Bradford, Division of Archaeological, Geographical and Environmental Sciences (AGES)
http://www.brad.ac.uk/archenvi/
-German Mining Museum (DBM), Department of Archaeometallurgy
http://www.bergbaumuseum.de/english/frame17f.html

PROFESSORS AND RESEARCHERS
-R. B. Mason
http://rbmason.ca/
-Professor Ernst Pernicka
http://www.ufg.uni-tuebingen.de/index.php?id=133
-Professor Thilo Rehren
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/silva/archaeology/staff/profiles/rehren
-Professor Robert S. Sternberg
http://www.fandm.edu/rsternbe
-Dr Andrew J Shortland
http://www.cranfield.ac.uk/cds/staff/shortlandandrewj.html
-Professor Carl Heron
http://www.brad.ac.uk/AGES/Research/index.php/Staff/ProfCarlHeron?list=AGES.Staff
-Professor Julian Henderson
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/Archaeology/People/julian.henderson

RELATED JOURNALS
-Archaeometry
http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0003-813X&site=1
-Journal of Archaeological Science
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622854/description#description
-Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
http://www.springerlink.com/content/121127/
-Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry
http://www.maajournal.com/
-Antiquity Journal
http://antiquity.ac.uk/

ARCHEOLOGY IRAN
-ICAR
http://www.icar.ir/documents/document/0/11586/Home.aspx
-RCCCR
http://www.rcccr.org/farsi/
http://ichto.ir/Default.aspx?alias=ichto.ir/rcccr
-Iranica Antiqua
http://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=journal&journal_code=IA
-The British Institute of Persian Studies
http://www.bips.ac.uk/

WEBLOGS
SAS-Blog
http://socarchsci.blogspot.com/
AWOL
http://ancientworldonline.blogspot.com/
Iran-Pareeneh
http://iranparineh.persianblog.ir/1386/8/
Asr-e Sang
http://lithic-studies.blogfa.com/
Professor John Hawks weblog
http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/chimpanzees
Pareeneh-Sangi
http://iran-pal-publication.blogfa.com/

What is Archaeometry? باستان سنجي چيست؟

باستان‌سنجی (آرکئومتری) یا علوم باستان شناسي علم ميان رشته اي نويني است که در آن یافته‌های باستانی توسط انواع مختلفی از روشها و فنون علمی و آزمایشگاهی مورد بررسی و تحقیق قرار می‌گیرند. به عبارت دیگر به کارگیری شاخه‌های مختلف علوم طبیعی و مهندسی به منظور درک و حل بهتر مسائل باستان شناسی، باستان‌سنجی نامیده می‌شود

In its broadest sense, "archaeometry" (or "archaeological science") represents the interface between archaeology and the natural and physical sciences. This interdisciplinary field requires close collaboration between archaeologists, art historians, museum curators, and scientists who apply modern instrumental techniques to extract structural and compositional information from ancient materials. Applications range from archaeological fieldwork to conservation of museum objects and historic monuments, including topics such as paleodiet, early tool use, provenance of ceramics and metals, prospection and geoarchaeology, dating, and art forgery.

Early archaeometric research was dominated by dating, technological, and provenance studies of inorganic materials (stone, ceramics, and metals). As the field has grown, new applications in biochemistry, soil science, paleopathology, medicine, and computer-aided reconstruction have attracted a host of new specialists and encouraged research on organic materials ranging from ancient DNA to plant phytoliths (plant skeletons). Similarly, advances in geophysical prospection and geochemistry have led to increased representation from those fields in archaeological excavation and laboratory analysis.

Source:http://www.isas.illinois.edu/atam/archaeometry_archaeology/whatisarchaeometry.html

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Hello and welcome! درود و عرض خوش آمد

با درود و عرض خوش آمد!

در اين وبلاگ مطالبي (شامل اخبار، همايش ها، دوره هاي آموزشي و....) در مورد علوم باستان شناسي شامل باستانسنجي (آركئومتري)، معدنكاري و فلزكاري كهن، زمين باستان شناسي و باستان شناسي (و نيز موضوعاتي چون روش هاي تجزيه اي، سن سنجي و ....) ارائه خواهد گرديد. اين مطالب بيشتر در مورد ايران و غرب آسيا و فرهنگ هاي مرتبط با آنها خواهد بود.
تلاش خواهد شد كه نوشتارها به هر دو زبان فارسي و انگليسي ارائه گردند.

Hello and welcome!
This web-log has been established in order to share information (including news, meeting calendar, etc.) about archaeological sciences (including archaeometry, archaeometallurgy, geoarchaeology, dating and analytical techniques, etc.), especially over the area of Iran and western Asia.
I try to run the web-log in both Persian and English languages.